What happens today
A supplier flags a delay, a shipment misses a milestone, or an inbound lot fails incoming inspection. The first sign is usually a message in an inbox, an update in the supplier portal, or an exception in the ERP, and it lands while the buyer responsible is working on something else.
The consequence has to be traced across the bill of materials.
A late or held part matters only through what depends on it. Which lines, which build orders, and which customer commitments sit downstream of the affected component is a question that has to be traced through the bill of materials and the open order book before anyone knows how urgent this actually is.
The alternative is bounded by rules, not just availability.
A substitute part or an alternate supplier is usable only if it is approved for the part, within purchasing policy on price and terms, and acceptable to the customer where the specification is controlled. Availability is the easy part. The constraints are what make the decision a judgment rather than a lookup.
The decision is made under time pressure with partial information.
By the time the options are assembled by hand, the window to act without stopping the line has often narrowed. The buyer decides against a moving clock, and the reasoning behind the choice is rarely captured anywhere the next audit or the next review can find it.
How the architecture runs it
A late shipment or a quality hold matters only through what depends on it, and the window to act without stopping the line narrows while the options are assembled by hand. The FLOW traces the impact through the bill of materials, assembles only the substitutions that are approved and within policy, and puts a bounded decision in front of the buyer against the clock.
purchasing defines the approved alternates, the price and term limits, and the customer-spec constraints
which signal, what was at risk, which option was chosen, under which policy, and on what evidence
What the FLOW does
Catch the signal.
A supplier alert, an inbound quality hold, or an ERP exception starts the FLOW; Connect captures it the moment it posts rather than when a planner notices it.
Trace the impact.
A Digital Task Agent traces the affected part through the bill of materials and the open order book to fix which lines, build orders, and customer commitments actually sit downstream.
Assemble bounded options.
Business Context assembles only the alternatives that are approved for the part, within purchasing policy on price and terms, and acceptable to the customer where the specification is controlled — not every option, only the usable ones.
Route the decision.
A Digital Supervisor puts the impact, the validated alternatives, and the policy limits in front of the buyer or planner in the Enterprise Workplace, so the call is a judgment rather than a lookup.
Execute and record.
Connect writes the approved substitution back to the ERP and the affected production orders, with the option chosen, the policy applied, and the evidence behind it on the record.
What it's worth
Here is what this FLOW returns to each.
Substitutions stay inside the price and term limits, and line-down cost is avoided by resolving the signal before the line runs dry.
A disruption becomes a contained, costed decision in minutes, with the impact traced from the BOM rather than reconstructed under pressure.
Runs above the ERP, purchasing, and supplier systems with no migration, and those systems stay your Systems of Record.
Buyers decide on bounded, policy-checked options instead of assembling alternates by hand while the clock runs.
Every substitution records which option was chosen, under which policy, and on what evidence, so a supply or spend review reads from the trail.
Coexistence
NEWWORK Connect reads from and writes to the systems that run production, including the MES, CMMS, ERP, quality, and HR platforms. Those systems remain your Systems of Record. NEWWORK runs above and between them, which is why a FLOW of this kind can go into production without a migration program standing in front of it.
You can begin with one of these FLOWs, with a Digital Employee owning a single recurring role, with an Enterprise Workplace for one plant, or with a complete Business Solution. Any starting point. Any combination. Your way.
Start above your existing systems. Replace selectively when it creates value.
Governed autonomy
Every FLOW produces one execution record: what happened, in what order, under which policy, by which human or which Digital Task Agent, on what evidence, and with what outcome.
Governed autonomy means the FLOW acts inside limits you set, escalates what it should not decide alone, and leaves a trace of both. The same record answers the safety audit, the customer escalation, and the reliability review, because it is the record of the work itself rather than a report written about it afterward.
That is what makes work of this kind safe to give to an AI system on a plant floor, where an error touches safety, cost, and a customer commitment at once. The capability is what makes the pilot worth running. The record is what makes it defensible.
AI-native by architecture. Agentic in execution. Autonomous where governed.